SEO · China sourcing agent

86,520 clicks for a China sourcing agent

1.9xgrowth multiple vs starting period
86,520total clicks
4,452,085total impressions
1,497last 4 weeks avg weekly clicks
Google Search Console performance chart for this client
Google Search Console, weekly clicks and impressions for the client property (web search), exported 2026-08-23 and charted by RAGSEO. Client name withheld; no figures estimated.

Client background

This China-based sourcing agent serves importers and wholesale buyers who need small commodities from the country's wholesale markets. The service covers product selection, factory audits, quality inspection, labeling and consolidated shipping, so buyers can place one order across many suppliers instead of managing each factory themselves.

Search queries in Swahili, Turkish and Hungarian point to a buyer base in Africa, Turkey and Central Europe, alongside English-language searches for wholesale furniture and towel manufacturing. That mix tells us the site has to speak to several markets at once, not just one.

Starting point

In the first quarter of the tracked period, the site averaged 989 clicks per week and 54.2K impressions per week. For a sourcing agent with a broad service list, those numbers suggest the pages existed but were not pulling their weight in search. The site lacked depth on the specific product and market queries buyers actually type, and many pages had no clear path from a search query to a service inquiry.

What RAGSEO did

RAGSEO ran the standard SEO method against the client's sourcing services and the query themes visible in Search Console.

  • Keyword and topic research around cleaning supplies, wholesale furniture, toy wholesale, China market sourcing and towel manufacturing, including non-English terms.
  • Website diagnosis and on-page fixes: title and meta tags, internal links between service and product pages, image ALT text and site architecture.
  • A RAG knowledge base built from the client's own service descriptions, factory audit process, inspection steps and shipping options, so drafts stayed accurate.
  • AI-assisted drafts reviewed by professional editors, published after client approval, aimed at buyer questions at each stage of sourcing.
  • Off-page backlinks and monthly Search Console reporting to track which queries moved and adjust the plan.

Results in Google Search Console

Over the 64 weeks ending 2026-08-17, the site recorded 86,520 clicks and 4,452,085 impressions in Google Search Console. The weekly trend moved from 989 clicks per week in the first quarter to 1,572 in the last quarter, a 1.6x rise, while weekly impressions went from 54.2K to 83.0K, a 1.5x rise. The peak week hit 2,159 clicks at week 46 of 64, and the last 4 weeks averaged 1,497 clicks per week.

MetricValue
Total clicks86,520
Total impressions4,452,085
First-quarter weekly clicks vs last-quarter weekly clicks989 vs 1,572 (x1.6)
First-quarter weekly impressions vs last-quarter weekly impressions54.2K vs 83.0K (x1.5)
Growth multiple vs starting period1.9x

First-page keyword wins cover several languages and buyer intents: vifaa vya usafi (cleaning supplies in Swahili) at average position 1.4, wholesale furniture market in china at 5.9, çin de olup türkiye de olmayan ürünler (products in China not in Turkey) at 4.8, kínai játék nagyker (Chinese toy wholesale) at 4.9, çin bazarı (China market sourcing) at 3.2, and china towel manufacturer at 3.5.

Third-party view: Semrush and AI search

Semrush data is not available for this client, so we cannot report an independent organic keyword or traffic trajectory from that source. Generative AI search data is also not available in the pack for this case, so there are no AI search impressions or most-cited content figures to share.

What we can say is that the Google Search Console numbers above are the full record for this engagement. Where third-party or AI search data is missing, we leave it out rather than estimate it.

What the data says and what comes next

The honest reading: growth is real but uneven. Weekly clicks rose 1.9x against the starting period, yet the peak week of 2,159 clicks at week 46 sits well above the last 4 weeks at 1,497 clicks per week. That gap means some of the peak traffic did not hold, and the site is now running below its best week. Impressions also grew more slowly than clicks, which points to better click-through on existing queries rather than a large expansion of query coverage.

The next step is to find out which pages lost ground after week 46 and why. In RAGSEO terms, that means a fresh on-page pass on those URLs, checking title and meta tags, internal links and content depth against the queries that still rank on page one, then adding off-page support where a page sits at position 4 to 6 and could move higher. Monthly Search Console reporting will show whether the last-quarter baseline holds.

Source: the client's Google Search Console (weekly export to 2026-08-23) and Semrush (US database, August 2026), read by RAGSEO as the property's SEO provider. Client name withheld; no figures estimated.